IT steering for enterprise groups and holdings
Multiple companies, different maturity levels - one shared steering baseline.
Typical situation in group structures
Different maturity levels without comparability
Each entity evaluates IT differently, so there is no dependable shared view of priorities, risk, or pressure to act.
Decentralised decisions without a shared data basis
Local decisions are made from isolated perspectives instead of one consolidated steering model.
No consolidated management view
Holding and group leadership rarely receives one consistent view of scores, dependencies, and investment needs.
What ARVANIS changes for enterprise groups
Group dashboard with scores, heatmaps, and comparisons
Results from multiple entities are condensed into one shared management view.
Shared standards with local differences
Each entity is assessed individually while staying comparable group-wide along the same logic.
Management view for holding and group leadership
The consolidated view creates a common basis for prioritisation, approvals, and steering.
Inside the group view
Group dashboard
Comparable scores and one consolidated overview across all entities.
Group structure
View of the holding structure, entities, and their operational assignment.
Management-ready visualisation
Dashboard view prepared for presentation and steering discussions with group leadership.